D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
R. Sabapathy – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer Labour Court and the Management, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation – Respondent
D. Hariparanthaman, J.
The Petitioner was a Conductor employed by the second Respondent Transport Corporation. The second Respondent Transport Corporation is operating passengers Transport in Tirunelveli, Tuticorin and adjoining districts. He was employed on daily rated basis at Rs. 42.50 per day between 15.11.1993 and 15.12.1996 for a period of three years. According to the Petitioner, he rendered uninterrupted service for three years between 15.11.1993 and 15.12.1996 and after 15.12.1996, he was abruptly denied employment, without any notice. He raised an Industrial Dispute regarding his non employment before the concerned Conciliation Officer and the Conciliation ended in failure. Thereafter, the Petitioner took up the matter before the first Respondent. The first Respondent took it on file as I.D. No. 179 of 1997.
2. The second Respondent Corporation filed a counter statement refuting the allegations of the Petitioner and the crux of the same is as follows:
The Petitioner has to establish that he rendered continuous service. As per the certified Standing Orders of the R
D.K. Yadav Vs. J.M.A. Industries Ltd.
Jagbir Singh v. Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board and anr.
M. Sekaran Vs. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Municipal Council, Sujanpur Vs. Surinder Kumar
R.M. Yellatti Vs. The Assistant Executive Engineer
Santosh Gupta Vs. State Bank of Patiala
Senior Superintendent, Telegraph (Traffic), Bhopal Vs. Santosh Kumar Seal and others
Sita Ram and Ors. Vs. Moti Lal Nehru Farmers Training Institute
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.