SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4291

S.BASKARAN
K. Chellamuthu – Appellant
Versus
R. Krishna Murthy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
U.M. Ravichandran, Adv., R. Sreevidhya, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

S.Baskaran, J.

Being not satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal dated 20.03.2013 made in MCOP.Nos.2272 and 2273 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal XVI Additional Court, Chennai, the present civil miscellaneous appeals are filed.

2. For sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to in this judgment as arrayed before the Tribunal.

3. The case of the petitioners is that on 20.04.2010 at about 21.40 hours, when the deceased Senthil Kumar driving his Maruthi Car bearing Registration No.TN-22-BY-8380 was proceeding in East Coast Road, from west to east and as he approached the Dhanalakshmi Engineering College, another car bearing Registration No. TN-31-AW-0009, came at high speed in the opposite direction and dashed against the car, in which the deceased was travelling causing fatal injuries to him. The accident occurred only due to the rash and negligent driving of the first respondent car driver. The petitioner/claimant in M.C.O.P.No.2273 of 2010, who is the father of the deceased states that his son was a

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top