S.VAIDYANATHAN
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Respondent – Respondent
1. These Applications are filed to vacate the interim order of injunction dated 19.03.2019 granted in O.A.Nos.171 and 172 of 2019 in the above Suit.
2. The Applicant 'Kasi Group of Companies' is the Defendant in the Suit and the Respondent herein viz. Palson Enterprises is the Plaintiff.
3. According to the Applicant, originally, his father Late Kasi Nadar had purchased a property measuring an extent of 23.40 acres in the year 1958 from one T.R.Bhavanishankar Joshi vide Sale Deed dated 27.01.1958. The said land was developed by the Applicant's father and a portion of the land was acquired by Tamil Nadu Housing Board for development of Housing project, leaving an extent of 8.41 acres to the Applicant's father and the said extent of land was later developed by the Applicant into housing plots, commercial and industrial plots after obtaining necessary approval from the authorities concerned. Around 80 plots were sold to various customers for their own use and all the documents were given to the prospective buyers in the name and style of “Kasi Estate”. The entire layout consisting around 140 grounds were part and parcel of Kasi Estate and it thus became a landmark and streets
N.R. Dongre v. Whirlpool Corpn.
Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah
Corn Products Refining Co. vs. Shangrilla Food Products Ltd.
N.R. Dongre v. Whirlpool Corpn.
Dhariwal Industries Limited & Another V. M.S.S. Food Products
Ramdev Food Products (P) Ltd. vs. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel
Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd. v. Borden Inc.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.