SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1317

T.RAVINDRAN
A. Krishnamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
Shingaraj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :K. Rajasekaran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and Decree dated 26.09.2018 made in A.S.No.218/2016 confirming the decreetal order of the City Civil Court in O.S. No.4277 of 2010 dated 03.02.2016.)

1. The second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 26.09.2018 passed in A.S.No.218/2016, on the file of the III Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 03.02.2016, passed in O.S. No.4277 of 2010, on the file of the XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. The plaintiff is found to have laid the suit against the defendants, seeking the relief of mandatory injunction directing the defendants 5 and 6 namely, The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai and the Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority to demolish the illegal construction put up by the defendants 1 to 4 on the eastern side of the plaintiff's compound wall of the plaint B schedule property without leaving any set back and without the approval of the defendants 5 & 6.

3. The above said suit laid by the plaintiff has been stoutly resisted by the defendants 1 to 4 contending that they have put up the construc






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top