SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1320

P.T.ASHA
Krishnaveni – Appellant
Versus
Vijaya – Respondent


.Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Balasubramaniam, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Review application is filed under O.47 Rule 1 of C.P.C. r/w under section 114 C.P.C. praying to review the findings recorded in the order passed by this Hon’ble Court in C.R.P.(PD) No.83 of 2018 dated 13.03.2018.)

1. The above Review Application is directed against the order dated 13.03.2018 in C.R.P.No.83 of 2018. The defendants are the review petitioners. It is necessary to briefly allude to the facts of the case for more fully appreciating the review petition now under consideration of this Court.

2. The respondent/plaintiff had filed the suit O.S.No.49 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif, Arakonam for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, servants and agents from in any way interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property.

3. The suit property is a house site bearing Survey No. 862/17 measuring an extent of 7½ cents (3270 sq.feet) in Thanigai Polur Village of Arakkonam Taluk together with a small hut constructed thereon.

4. The plaintiff had come forward with a case that the property originally belonged to one Kupusamy Naidu, who sold the suit property to the plaintiff’s father M.Subramani under a registe





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top