SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1350

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
A. Rajasekaran – Appellant
Versus
Director General of Railway Protection Force, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K. Prem Kumar.
For the Respondent: Ramachandramurthy.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating the impugned order of the 1st respondent vide No. 2011/Sec(E)/DAR-2/3(CC) dated 15.02.2011, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to pay all the service and monetary benefits to the petitioner with interest.

1. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order of the 1st respondent vide No. 2011/Sec(E)/DAR-2/3(CC) dated 15.02.2011, to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to pay all the service and monetary benefits to the petitioner with interest.

2. The short issue which arises in this case is as to whether both minor and major penalty can be imposed for one incident. The writ petitioner was appointed as a Constable in the Railway Protection Force. He was promoted as Head Constable. On 21.04.2005, he was assigned for an escort duty to travel in train bearing number 5012 from Chennai Central to Jolarpettai. At about 3.20 A.M. the petitioner went to attend n


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top