SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
A. Rajasekaran – Appellant
Versus
Director General of Railway Protection Force, New Delhi – Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating the impugned order of the 1st respondent vide No. 2011/Sec(E)/DAR-2/3(CC) dated 15.02.2011, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to pay all the service and monetary benefits to the petitioner with interest.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order of the 1st respondent vide No. 2011/Sec(E)/DAR-2/3(CC) dated 15.02.2011, to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to pay all the service and monetary benefits to the petitioner with interest.
2. The short issue which arises in this case is as to whether both minor and major penalty can be imposed for one incident. The writ petitioner was appointed as a Constable in the Railway Protection Force. He was promoted as Head Constable. On 21.04.2005, he was assigned for an escort duty to travel in train bearing number 5012 from Chennai Central to Jolarpettai. At about 3.20 A.M. the petitioner went to attend n
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.