SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4467

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Rajathi – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Salem – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. Jagadeesan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R. Janaki, Additional Government Pleader, G.Sankaran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. The writ petition on hand is filed for a direction to forbear the respondents in any manner dispossessing the writ petitioner from the land in Patta 275 Survey No.18/8 measuring 1.84 acres Hasthampatti Village in Salem District.

2. The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner, states that a piece of land measuring 1.8 acres in Survey No.18/3 Hasthampatti Village was held by one Venga Gounder, the great Grandfather of the writ petitioner's husband. The said land has been in continuous use and enjoyment and possession of the family of the writ petitioner's husband for over 67 years. The Settlement Officer of Dharapuram granted patta after sub division of land Survey Number as 18/8 and Patta Number as 275. The land is assessed and tax is being paid.

3. The writ petitioner states that the land was under cultivation at the time of filing of the writ petition and the paddy was 25 days old. On 19.11.2003, the second respondent came to the land and informed that the said land should not be used by the writ petitioner for cultivation. The respondents had not listening to the words of the writ petitioner. Thus, the writ petitioner made a representation on 21.11.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top