SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1382

N.ANAND VENKATESH
Umadevi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : N. Ponraj and S. Marisingh
For the Respondent: M. Prabhavathi, APP

ORDER :

N. Anand Venkatesh, J.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.11.2018, for an offence u/s. 120(B), 406, 420 IPC and Section 5 of TNPID Act, in Crime No. 3 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner's husband named Jagadeeswaran was involved in construction business and was also running Finance Business in the name of various firms. He used to collect money from the general public by assuring that he will construct and hand over the houses. However, the accused persons failed to keep up the promise. By utilising the various amounts collected from the public, the accused persons purchased various movable and immovable properties in their names. There are totally 10 accused persons in this case and A1 to A6 are the various firms run by the accused persons, A7 is the husband of this petitioner, who had collected the deposits and purchased the movable and immovable properties and this petitioner is added as A10 on the ground that she was also involved in the entire transaction.

3. The accused person had collected from nearly 65 depositors, a sum of Rs. 2,71,90,350/-. The husband of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top