SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1400

R.SUBBIAH, C.SARAVANAN
Meenakshi – Appellant
Versus
Premkumar Nachiappan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :M. Ramamoorthy, Advocate.
For the Respondent:N.R. Chandran, Senior Advocate, M. Arunkumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

R. Subbiah, J.

(Prayer: CMA No. 1455 of 2007: Appeal filed under Section 19 of Family Courts Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.01.2007 passed in F.C.O.P. No. 440 of 2005 on the file of I Additional Family Court Judge, Chennai.

CMA No. 1456 of 2007: Appeal filed under Section 19 of Family Courts Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.01.2007 passed in F.C.O.P. No. 910 of 2006 on the file of I Additional Family Court Judge, Chennai.)

1. The appellant has come forward with these appeals aggrieved by the common Degree and Judgment dated 10.01.2007 passed by the learned I Additional Family Court Judge, Chennai in FCOP Nos. 440 of 2005 and 910 of 2006. While FCOP No. 440 of 2005 was filed by the respondent-husband for grant of a decree of divorce, FCOP No. 910 of 2006 was filed by the appellant herein under Section 9 of The Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights. After considering the rival claim, the Family Court by the said common order dated 10.01.2007 allowed the Original Petition filed by the respondent/husband and granted a decree of divorce while dismissing the Original Petition filed by the appellant/wife for restitution of conjugal rights.

2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top