SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4415

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
M. Ravi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :N. Krishnaveni, Senior Counsel for P. Thiagarajan, Advocate
For the Respondents:K.K. Senthil, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 15.09.2003 made in O.S.No.900 of 1995 passed by the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Trichy.)

1. The defendant in O.S.No.900 of 1995 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Trichy, is the appellant herein.

2. O.S.No.900 of 1995 had been filed by two plaintiffs, M.Ravi and Jayashree, who are siblings. The second plaintiff was a minor, at the time of institution of the suit. They filed the suit against the defendant, Natarajan, seeking a judgment and decree declaring that they are the owners of the suit schedule property and for consequential relief of recovery of possession and also for a direction against him to pay Rs.18,000/- as past mesne profit for 3 years and for a further direction against him to pay future mesne profit till the delivery of possession and also for costs of the suit.

3. The suit was originally filed in forma pauperis. The suit property was plot No.C/12 in T.S.No.754, Ranganathar Cooperative Colony, Srirangam, Trichy measuring an extent of 4576 sq.ft together building measuring an extent of 600 sq.ft. This suit came up

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top