SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1412

R.PONGIAPPAN
Thiyagarajan – Appellant
Versus
Vairavasundaram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :R. Suriya Narayanan, Advocate
For the Respondent:H. Arumugam, E. Balasubramanian, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated 19.08.2008 in A.S.No.47 of 2008 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Pudukottai, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 14.11.2007 in O.S.No.5 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Pudukottai.)

1. The appellant in this appeal is the defendant in O.S.No.5 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Pudukottai and respondent in A.S.No.47 of 2008 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Pudukottai.

2. The respondent herein filed a suit in O.S.No.5 of 2006 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Pudukottai, seeking for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant and his men from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property by the plaintiff. The learned Principal District Munsif, Pudukottai, by Judgment and Decree dated 14.11.2007, had dismissed the suit with costs.

3. Aggrieved over the same, the plaintiff/respondent herein filed an appeal before the learned Subordinate Judge, Pudukottai in A.S.No.47 of 2008. The learned Subordinate Judge, Pudukottai, by Judgment and Decree dated 19.08.2008, had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top