SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1466

R.HEMALATHA
Nagaiyasamy – Appellant
Versus
Thangam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :V. Meenakshisundaram, Advocate
For the Respondents:V. Maharajan, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

R. Hemalatha, J.

1. The unsuccessful Plaintiff before both the Courts below has filed the present Appeal.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per the ranking in the Trial Court and at appropriate places their ranking in the Second Appeal will also be indicated if necessary.

3. The brief facts of the Appellant/Plaintiff is as follows:

3(i). The Suit property originally belonged to the Plaintiff's father, who died intestate on 19.10.1996 and the Plaintiff became entitled to the Suit property. He has also been paying tax for the Suit property. The First Defendant was a Tenant in the Suit property in the Ground Floor portion on a Monthly Rental basis. The tenancy was oral. Though the Plaintiff requested the First Defendant to vacate the Suit premises, the First Defendant did not vacate the same, but promised to pay Rs. 200 per mensem. Since the First Defendant did not keep up his promise, the Plaintiff issued a Notice to him and the First Defendant, in spite of receipt of the said Notice, did not come forward to the pay arrears of Rent or vacate the Suit premises. Therefore, the Plaintiff issued another Legal Notice dated 6.3.1998, (a copy of receipt is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top