SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4508

G.JAYACHANDRAN
Manu Kounder – Appellant
Versus
Porapathai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : T. Dhanyakumar.
For the Respondents: V. Girishkumar, R. Aswini.

JUDGMENT :

G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.

Prayer: Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 29.01.2004 made in A.S. No. 28 of 2003 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Villupuram confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2002 made in O.S. No. 127 of 2001 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Ulundurpet.

1. Defendants 1 to 4 in the suit are the appellants before this Court in this Second Appeal. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as per their ranking and description in the plaint.

2. Respondents 1 and 2 are the plaintiffs, who have laid the suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property.

3. The Brief averments in the plaint is that the suit property morefully described in the plaint was originally owned by one Pichakarachi ammal @ Chellammal and Chinnaiya Udayar. The said suit property is adjacent to the land in S. Nos. 120/1 and 120/2, which is also owned by Pichakarachi ammal @ Chellammal and Chinnaiya Udayar. The father of the plaintiffs one Marimuthu Gounder h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top