SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1487

P.T.ASHA
P. Subramani – Appellant
Versus
Chinnasami – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : V. Anandhamurthy, Adv.
For the Respondent: M. Guruprasad, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.9 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Erode dated 09.07.2003 reversing the Judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.5 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Erode dated 14.12.2001.)

1. The plaintiff is the appellant before this Court. The Second Appeal is filed challenging the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.9 of 2002, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode, in and by which the learned subordinate Judge had reversed the Judgment and Decree of the Principal District Munsif, Erode, in O.S.No.5 of 1999.

2. The suit O.S.No.5 of 1999 was filed for a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant, his men and agents from interfering with the plaintiff's right of access for his vehicles, cattle and men from Kongu Engineering College road in the west to and from RSF.No.297/4 of Veppampalayam Village in the east through RSF.No.297/7 of the same village. The property comprised in RSF No.297/4 was described as the A-Schedule and the property comprised in RSF.No.297/7 was described as the B-Schedule to the suit prope

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top