SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1490

T.RAVINDRAN
Kannan @ Palani – Appellant
Versus
Mayilal @ Pappathi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :K. Ponmani, M/s. V. Rajesh, Advocates.
For the Respondents: N. Manokaran Adv., N. Manikandan, GA (CS).

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and Decree dated 25.11.2002 made in A.S.No.59 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Bhavani confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.06.2002 made in O.S.No.519 of 1999 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Bhavani.)

1. In this second appeal, challenge is made to the judgement and decree dated 25.11.2002 passed in A.S.No.59 of 2002 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Bhavani, confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.06.2002 passed in O.S.No.519 of 1999 on the file of the Second Additional District Munsif Court, Bhavani.

2. The second appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law:

1. Whether a suit for declaration of title can be decreed in the absence of any documents filed by the plaintiff to prove title or possession?

2. In a suit for declaration of title whether the burden can be cast on the defendant to prove title?

3. Considering the scope of the issues involved between the parties as regards the subject matter lying in a narrow compass, it is unnecessary to dwell into the facts of the case in detail.

4. For the sake of convenience, the parties a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top