SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1494

N.SESHASAYEE
Amirtham – Appellant
Versus
Lalithamani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :V. Manohar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:K. Ragupathy, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 08.08.2007 made in A.S.No.23 of 2004 on the file of the First Additional Subordinate Court at Coimbatore filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 08.03.2004 made in O.S.No.2232 of 1994 on the file of the III Additional Munsif Court at Coimbatore by reversing the judgment made in suit.)

1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.2232 of 1994 on the file of III Additional Munsif Court at Coimbatore, having succeeded before the trial Court, but lost before the first Appellate Court in A.S.No.23 of 2004 has come before this Court. The suit is laid for mandatory injunction. Parties would be referred to by their rank before the trial court.

2. The facts leading to this case are in narrow compass:

The suit property is described as a narrow strip of land measuring 2' X 58' running north to south. The properties of the plaintiff and the defendant lie adjacently, and the defendant's property lie to the east of plaintiff's property. The aforesaid suit property lies between these two properties and controversy now required to be addressed in this appeal is in whose property the suit pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top