SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1592

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Ki.AR.AL. Alagappan Ambalam & Others - Appellant
Versus
S. Karpaga Vinayagar Firm, Rep. by its Partner M.Krishnan Servai, Karaikudi & Others - Respondent
C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) Nos. 278, 740 of 2006, 1259 of 2009 & 1230 of 2002 & Rev.Aplc.(MD) Nos. 7 of 2006, 39, 40, 48 of 2007 & W.P.(MD) No. 10716 of 2013 & Cont.P.(MD) No. 897 of 2013 & M.P.(MD) Nos. 1 of 2007 & 1, 2, 3 of 2009 & 1 of 2011 & 1 of 2013, 1, 2 of 2014
Decided On : 09-08-2019

Advocate Appeared:
Nalini Chaidambaram, M. Vallinayagam, Senior Counsels, D. Muruganandham, Additional Government Pleader, J. Anandakumar, K.K. Senthilvelan, G. Prabhu Rajadurai, R. Vijayakumar, T.V. Sivakumar, Niranjan S. Kumar, D. Nallathambi, T. Antony Arulraj, J. Barathan, H. Lakshmishankar, S.M.S. Johnny Basha, S. Srinivasaraghavan, Anand Chandrasekar for M/s. Sarvabhauman Associates, Advocates.

The Court appointed Receiver is not liable to convey any further land to the purchaser, where the entire land sold by the Court appointed Receiver was correctly measured and handed over to the purchaser.

Headnote:

RECEIVER - SALE OF PROPERTY - MEASUREMENT OF LAND - DISPUTE - RE-MEASUREMENT OF LAND - ENCROACHMENT - EVICTION OF ENCROACHERS - POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OF PROPERTY - SALE DEED - EXECUTION OF SALE DEED - ALTERNATIVE LAND - COMPENSATION - MONETARY BENEFITS - COURT APPOINTED RECEIVER - COLLUSION - IRREGULARITIES - ALLEGATIONS - CONDUCT OF PARTNER OF PURCHASER - RE-MEASUREMENT OF LAND - SURVEY REPORT - ENCROACHMENT BY ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY - LIBERTY TO PURCHASER TO EVICT ENCROACHERS - DISMISSAL OF CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS - REVIEW APPLICATIONS - WRIT PETITION - CONTEMPT PETITION.

Fact of the Case:

The properties, which are the subject matter in these cases, belonged to the common estate of Kottaiyur Nattars. On account of the internal disputes with regard to the possession and enjoyment of the properties commonly, a civil suit came to be instituted on the file of the Sub Court, Devakottai in O.S.No.72 of 1933, which was subsequently, adjudicated by the Sub Court, Ramanathapuram and a decree of partition was issued in O.S.No.21 of 1936. There were two plaintiffs and 98 defendants in the said suit. A Commissioner was appointed to divide the properties by metes and bounds among the persons, who were held to be entitled to the share in the subject properties owned by Ettukarai Valambars of Kottaiyur. The Sub Court, Ramanathapuram, passed a decree on 30.09.1937.

Finding of the Court:

The entire area of the land sold out by the Court appointed Receiver in favour of M/s.Karpagavinayagar Firm, through the registered sale deed dated 07.02.1983, is very much in existence and there is no shortfall in respect of the measurements as per the said sale deed. However, the portion of the land measuring 4.28 Acres, which is marked as “B” in the map attached to the report of the Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, Sivagangai District, reveals that the said portion marked as “B” is now with the possession and enjoyment of Alagappa University. Accordingly, this Court is of an opinion that the encroachers are to be evicted by following the due process of law.

Issues: Whether the land sold by the Court appointed Receiver was correctly measured and handed over to the purchaser M/s.Karpagavinayagar Firm.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court appointed Receiver has no obligation to part with any other further land in favour of M/s.Karpagavinayagar Firm. In other words, the land measuring 4.28 Acres identified for execution of the sale deed in favour of M/s.Karpagavinayagar Firm now becomes unnecessary. Accordingly, M/s.Karpagavinayagar Firm is at liberty to institute appropriate actions for eviction of encroachers, based on the sale deed executed by the Court appointed Receiver on 07.02.1983 in respect of the encroached portion of the land, which is marked as “B” in the map annexed along with the report of the Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, Sivagangai.

Final Decision: The civil revision petitions, review applications, writ petition and contempt petition were disposed of accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

1. The common facts leading to filing of these batch of cases are enumerated for considering the issues raised in all the cases.

2. The properties, which are the subject matter in these cases, belonged to the common estate of Kottaiyur Nattars. On account of the internal disputes with regard to the possession and enjoyment of the properties commonly, a civil suit came to be instituted on the file of the Sub Court, Devakottai in O.S.No.72 of 1933, which was subsequently, adjudicated by the Sub Court, Ramanathapuram and a decree of partition was issued in O.S.No.21 of 1936. There were two plaintiffs and 98 defendants in the said suit. A Commissioner was appointed to divide the properties by metes and bounds among the persons, who were held to be entitled to the share in the subject properties owned by Ettukarai Valambars of Kottaiyur. The Sub Court, Ramanathapuram, passed a decree on 30.09.1937.

3. Thereafter, the Sub Court, Devakottai, passed an order in I.A.No. 701 of 1944 in O.S.No.72 of 1933 on 15.01.1945 appointing Sri.S.R.Govinda Iyer as Receiver of the suit properties measuring about 2000 Acres of land to effect partition as per the Decree. The Court appointed Receiver was granted with the permission in the order dated 15.01.1945 to dispose of the properties for the discharge of the encumbrances.

4. On 19.11.1956, the Sub Court, Devakottai, closed the final decree application leaving certain properties, which had not been divided in common between all the sharers. The Court appointed Receiver continued to be in management of the subject properties, which had not been divided.

5. In the meanwhile, a Trust, namely, Dr.Alagappa Chettiar College Trust was founded and the Government of Tamil Nadu acquired lands extensively and an area of 252 Acres of land of Kottaiyur Nattars estate was notified for acquisition. The Court appointed Receiver challenged the same and subsequently entered into a compromise with the Government of Tamil Nadu. By the said compromise, the Government dropped the acquisition proceedings in respect of 62.80 Acres of land and the Court appointed Receiver also had given up the claim for enhanced compensation. Subsequently, near about 3.80 Acres of land was notified as an area for District Sports Meet by the Government and the Court appointed Receiver was unaware of the same.

6. There were two private temples in the said estate, which were in the dilapidated condition and as per the sentiments and wishes expressed by the Kottaiyur Nattars, the Court appointed Receiver had undertaken the process of construction and repairing works of the said temples. However, on account of paucity of fund, the Court appointed Receiver was not able to continue the renovation works in the said two temples. Thus, a decision was taken to sell 38.70 Acres of land out of 62.80 Acres exempted by the Government from the acquisition proceedings as the said land was filled up with shrubs and it was an uneven ground.

7. The Court appointed Receiver moved the Sub Court by filing I.A.No.30 of 1983 seeking permission to sell the lands for the purpose of completion of the renovation works of the temples and the Sub Court, by order dated 27.01.1983, accorded sanction to sell 38.70 Acres in favour of M/s.Karpagavinayagar Firm, for a sale consideration of Rs.5,00,000/-. A sale deed was executed and out of the said funds, the temples were renovated and repairing works were also carried out and thereafter, Kumbabishekam rituals were performed. M/s.Karpagavinayagar Firm, purchaser of the land measuring 38.70 Acres, reclaimed and levelled the properties by spending a considerable amount and subsequently, found that a portion of the land measuring 3.80 Acres acquired by the Government also formed part of the said sale deed. M/s.Karpagavinayagar Firm made a complaint about the said fact to the Court appointed Receiver, in consultation with Kottaiyur Nattars agreed to make good the loss by 5 Acres of land contagious to the rest of the lands. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top