SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1652

T.S.SIVAGNANAM, R.THARANI
M. Senthil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Corporation, Madurai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M. Suresh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R. Murali, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

T.S. Sivagnanam, J.

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarirfied Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned notice kt2/k.r.1/010504/19 dated 26.08.2019 passed by the second respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to transfer the shop license Ref.No.tp4/117675/80 dated 07.10.1980 in the petitioner's name from his father's name based on the representation of the petitioner dated 03.09.2019.)

1. Heard Mr.M.Suresh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Murali, learned counsel who accepts notice for the respondents.

2. An earlier occasion, we have considered the validity of the identical notice and all the writ petitions have been dismissed. While dismissing the writ petitions, we took note of the direction issued by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.P(MD).Nos.12188, 4339 and 13026 of 2019 dated 02.07.2019. The said order reads as follows:-

“This Court, in continuation and in conjunction with the orders dated 04.06.2019 and 11.06.2019, is passin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top