SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1723

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
S. Mallika – Appellant
Versus
R. Krishnaveni – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :J. Ramakrishnan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:V. Bhiman, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC, against the judgment and decree of the learned I Additional Sub Judge, Salem, in A.S.No.97 of 2010 dated 24.06.2011 confirming the judgment and decree of the Learned II Additional District Munsif,Salem, in O.S.No.1319 of 2008 dated 10.02.2010.

1. The Defendant in O.S.No.1319 of 2008 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Salem, is the Appellant herein.

2. O.S.No.1319 of 2008 had been filed by R.Krishnaveni, seeking a preliminary decree of 2/3rd share with respect to two items of suit property in S.No.49/3B, Achan Kuttapatti Village, Ayothiyapattinam, Salem. The first item of suit property measures 1.55 acres and the second item of suit property measures 0.46 acre, totally 2.01 acres of Punja land. By judgment and decree dated 10.02.2010, the learned II Additional District Munsif, Salem, had granted 1/3rd undivided share to the Plaintiff. The Defendant then filed A.S.No.97 of 2010 on the file of the I Additional Sub Court, Salem. By judgment dated 24.06.2011, the First Appeal was dismissed and the judgm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top