SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1753

T.RAVINDRAN
Veerabadran – Appellant
Versus
Paramathal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :D. Shivakumaran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the Judgment and Decree dated 18.07.2013 passed in A.S.No.137 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Salem, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 26.06.2008 passed in O.S.No.1275 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Salem.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

3. Suit for Permanent Injunction.

4. The case of the plaintiff in brief is that the suit property belonged to one Kandasamy and the defendant and they have executed two separate power deeds in the names of V. Kannammal and Kala by way of the registered power deeds dated 13.05.1996 and on the basis of the same, the power of Attorney Kannammal and Kala had executed the sale deeds in the name of the plaintiff on 02.03.2004 for a valid consideration and put the plaintiff in the possession of the suit property on the date of the sale and the suit property being a vacant site and Natham patta also been granted in favour of the Power of Attorney by the Natham Thashildar and therefore, the defendant, who had executed the registered sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top