Spicejet Limited vs Credit Suisse AG, a Stock Corporation

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1784

S.MANIKUMAR, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Spicejet Limited – Appellant
Versus
Credit Suisse AG, a Stock Corporation – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ramakrishnan Veeraraghavan, P.S. Raman.
For the Respondents: Ashok Menon, Rahul Balaji, R. Parthasarathy, Robin, R. David, Dhiraj Philip, M/s. Paul & Paul J. Hudson Samuel.

JUDGMENT :

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.

Prayer: Original Side Appeal filed under Section 483 of Companies Act, 1956 read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 07.09.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in CP No. 363 of 2015.

Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 11.01.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in CP No. 14 of 2015.

Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 18.08.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in CP No. 172 of 2011.

1. Judgments and orders passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in CP No. 14 of 2015 dated 11.01.2017, CP No. 172 of 2011 dated 18.08.2017 and CP No. 363 of 2015 dated 07.09.2017, has been challenged in OSA Nos. 477 & 479 of 2018, 478 of 2018 and 287 of 2017, respectively.

2. The question which arises for consideration is the scope and ambit o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1784

S.MANIKUMAR, SUBRAMONIUM PRASADSpicejet Limited – AppellantVersusCredit Suisse AG, a Stock Corporation – Respondent

S.MANIKUMAR, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Spicejet Limited – Appellant
Versus
Credit Suisse AG, a Stock Corporation – Respondent