T.RAVINDRAN
N. Mani – Appellant
Versus
Babyammal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and Decree dated 30.10.2015 passed in A.S.No.3 of 2015 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore at Ranipet, Vellore District, confirming the judgment and preliminary decree passed in O.S.No.36 of 2006 dated 19.12.2014 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ranipet.)
1. In this Second Appeal, challenge is made to the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2015 passed in A.S.No.3 of 2015 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Vellore at Ranipet, confirming the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2014 passed in O.S.No.36 of 2006 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Ranipet.
2. The Second Appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law:
i. Whether the Courts below have committed legal error in admitting and clubbing the “B” Schedule property belonged to mother Valliammal in the partition claim, by construing as joint family property, ignoring section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956?
ii. Whether the Courts below have committed legal error in countenancing the claim of the respondent/plaintiff for partition with regard to “B” schedul
Bachhaj Nahar Vs. Nilima Mandal and another
Digambar Adhar Patil Vs. Devram Girdhar Patil (died) and another
Himayam Engineers and Builders, rep. By its Proprietor P.Ramna Reddy Vs. S.Ravichandran and others
Kale and others Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and others
Karam Kapathi and others Vs. Lal Chand Public Charitable Trust and another
Maya Alias Hira Bai (Died) and others Vs. Prema
S.V.R.Mudaliar (dead) by LRs and others Vs. Rajabu F.Buhari (dead) by LRs and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.