SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1846

R.PONGIAPPAN
R. Raja – Appellant
Versus
R. Ramasamy – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :R. Subramanian, D. Venkatesh, Advocates.
For the Respondent:S. Madhavan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 03.08.2001 made in A.S.No.149 of 1999 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, reversing the judgment and decree dated 06.11.1998 made in O.S.No.179 of 1994 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Nilakkottai.

1. This Second Appeal has been preferred by the appellants/defendants, challenging the judgment and decree dated 03.08.2001 made in A.S.No.149 of 1999 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, reversing the judgment and decree dated 06.11.1998 made in O.S.No.179 of 1994 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Nilakkottai.

2. The respondent/plaintiff herein has filed a suit in O.S.No.179 of 1994 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Nilakkottai, seeking for the relief of declaration, declaring that the respondent/plaintiff was the absolute owner of the suit property and for the relief of consequential injunction, restraining the appellants/defendants and their men from in any way interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The learned District Mun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top