SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1887

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.K. SASIDHARAN, ABDUL QUDDHOSE, JJ.
V. Jothiraman @ Ramesh Anand – Appellant
Versus
R. Nalini and Others – Respondents
C.M.A. No. 3166 of 2014, Crl. R.C. No. 138 of 2012
Decided On : 01-10-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Samira S. Shah for M/s. Shah & Shah.
For the Respondent: S. Baskaran.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to dispose of cases in terms of a settlement agreement reached by the parties, thereby obviating the need for further adjudication.

Headnote:

Maintenance - Domestic Violence Act - The court disposed of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and the criminal revision case in terms of the memorandum of agreement and joint memorandum of compromise between the parties, leading to no need for factual adjudication of the issues raised.

Fact of the Case:

The parties settled the matter amicably and agreed to a sum of Rs. 5,00,000 to be paid by the appellant to the respondent in full quit. The court took the memorandum of agreement and joint memorandum of compromise on record.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that since the parties had settled the matter, there was no need for factual adjudication of the issues raised in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and the criminal revision case, and therefore disposed of the cases in terms of the settlement agreement.

Issues: The main issue was the payment of maintenance under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the fact that the parties had amicably settled the matter and reached a compromise, rendering the need for further adjudication unnecessary.

Final Decision: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and the criminal revision case were disposed of in terms of the memorandum of agreement and joint memorandum of compromise between the parties, with no costs imposed.

JUDGMENT :

K.K. SASIDHARAN, J.

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed against the order dated 24.12.2010 of the III Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai in I.A. No. 999 of 2010 in O.P. No. 2391 of 2009.

Crl. R.C. filed against the order of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai dated 01.12.2011 in C.A. No. 234 of 2010.

1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A. No. 3166 of 2014 is filed against the order dated 24 December 2010 in I.A. No. 999 of 2010 in O.P. No. 2391 of 2009, directing the appellant to pay interim maintenance at the rate of Rs. 3000/- to the respondent.

2. The Criminal Revision in Crl. R.C. No. 138 of 2012 is directed against the judgment dated 1 December 2011 in C.A. No. 234/2010, dismissing the criminal appeal filed by the appellant and confirming the judgment dated 12 November 2010 in C.C. No. 1641/2010 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, directing him to pay maintenance @ Rs. 3,000/- p.m. under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

3. Since both the matters are interconnected, the Hon’ble Chief Justice by order dated 28 August 2019, directed the Registry to post the Crl. R.C. No. 138 of 2012 along with C.M.A. No. 3166 of 2014 before the roster Division Bench dealing with Civil Miscellaneous Appeals. Accordingly, Crl. R.C. No. 138 of 2012 and C.M.A. No. 3166 of 2014 are posted before this Bench.

4. The matter was earlier referred to the Lok Adalat for settlement. Before the Lok Adalat, the parties have amicably settled the matter in and by which, the appellant agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) to the respondent in full quit. The memorandum of agreement dated 4 September 2018 executed by the parties is taken on record.

5. The parties have now filed a joint memorandum of compromise dated 30 September 2019 indicating the terms of the settlement. The appellant has already paid a sum of Rs. One lakh to the first respondent in partial discharge of the amount undertaken to be paid by him for settlement. The mode of payment of the balance amount of Rs.4 lakhs is also indicated in the joint memorandum of compromise. The memorandum of agreement filed before the Mediation Centre in Mediation Case File No. 854/2018 and the joint memorandum of compromise dated 30 September 2019 shall form part of the record.

6. Since the parties have settled the matter, there is no need for a factual adjudication of the issue raised in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and the criminal revision case.

7. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and the criminal revision case are disposed of in terms of the memorandum of agreement dated 4 September 2018 and the joint memorandum of compromise dated 30 September 2019. No costs. Consequently, M.P. No. 1 of 2014 and C.M.P. No. 13014 of 2018 are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top