JUDGMENT :

N. Sathish Kumar, J.

1. Aggrieved over the order rejecting the application filed under Order II 21 (sic) rule 97, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. Similarly, Aggrieved over the decree and judgment passed by the First Appellate Court dismissing the appeal in A.S. No. 123 of 1997, confirming the decree and judgment passed by the trial Court in O.S. No. 1846 of 1994 the present Second Appeal is filed. Since the subject matter in both CRP and Second Appeal is one and the same and the parties are also one and the same, this Court is inclined to dispose of both the matters in a common judgment.

2. The brief facts leading to file this Civil Revision Petition are as follows:

2.(a) The Petitioner filed an application to obstruct the delivery, ordered by the trial Court on the ground that they purchased the suit property vide sale deed dated 27.3.1986, 6.12.2001 and 14.3.2002. The decree passed in O.S. No. 750 of 1981 is not valid and not binding on the suit property. The Petitioner also filed O.S. No. 230 of 2006. Similarly, the respondent also filed O.S. No. 1846 of 1994 and sought injunction restraining the petitioner not to demolish the building. As against, the decre