SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 2142

N.ANAND VENKATESH
G. Thirumurugan Gandhi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.R. Elango, Adv., E. Raj Thilak, Adv., A. Natarajan, Adv., M. Mohamed Riyaz, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

N. Anand Venkatesh, J.

All these Criminal Original Petitions have been filed seeking for the relief of quashing the FIRs registered against the petitioner by the respective respondent Police in each case.

2. For the sake of easy understanding, the FIRs registered against the petitioner, offences involved and the offending statements said to have been made by the petitioner, is extracted hereunder:

TABLE AND EXTRACT OF OFFENDING STATEMENTS IN CASES INVOLVING G.THIRUMURUGAN GANDHI

S. No.

Crl.O.P. No.

Crime No.

Date of FIR

Date of Alleged Offence

Offence

1.

Crl.O.P. No. 30026/2018

Crime No.1110/2018

11.07.2018

25.05.2018

Ss. 124A, 153, 505 (1) (b) 505 (1) (c) of Indian Penal Code, 1860

2.

Crl.O.P.No.3002 9/2018

Crime No.2773/2017

12.12.2017

25.07.2018

Ss. 13(1) (b) of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 & S.505 (1) (b) of Indian Penal Code, 1860

3.

Crl.O.P. No. 30031/2018

Crime No.49/2018

18.01.2018

04.03.2017

Ss. 153, 505 (1) (b) of Indian Penal Code, 1860

4.

Crl.O.P.No.30032/2018

Cr

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top