P.N.PRAKASH
G. Selvam – Appellant
Versus
R. Karthikeyan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Criminal Revision preferred under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to set aside the judgment and order dated 08.10.2012 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore in C.A.No.2 of 2012 confirming the judgment and order dated 10.12.2011 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Coimbatore in S.T.C.No.153 of 2009.)
1. This Criminal Revision has been preferred challenging the judgment and order dated 08.10.2012 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore in C.A.No.2 of 2012 confirming the judgment and order dated 10.12.2011 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Coimbatore in S.T.C.No.153 of 2009.
2. For the sake of convenience, the petitioner and the respondent will be referred to as accused and complainant respectively.
3. It is the case of the complainant that, the accused borrowed Rs.13,00,000/- on 11.05.2008 and executed a demand promissory note (Ex.P1); thereafter, the accused issued a cheque dated 18.05.2008 for Rs.13,00,000/- (Ex.P2), which was presented by him (complainant) on 27.09.2008, returned with the endorsement “exceeds arrangement” vide bank memo (Ex.P3); he (complainant) issued a statutory demand notice dated 30.09.20
Bir Singh Vs Mukesh Kumar [(2019) 4 SCC 197]
Duli Chand v. Delhi Admn.[(1975) 4 SCC 649 : 1975 SCC (Cri) 663 : AIR 1975 SC 1960]
Girish Kumar Suneja Vs. CBI [(2017) 14 SCC 809
Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH [(2008) 14 SCC 457]
State of Maharashtra Vs Jagmohan Singh Kuldip Singh Anand and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.