SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 2339

R.PONGIAPPAN
M. Panneerselvam – Appellant
Versus
M. Sundaramoorthy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M. Uma Shankar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Deivasigamani, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order dated 17.03.2014 passed in I.A.No.716 of 2011 in O.S.No.255 of 2008 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Vellore.)

1. The defendant in O.S.No.255 of 2008 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Vellore is the petitioner. Before the said court, the respondent herein filed a suit as against the revision petitioner and seeking the relief of direction directing the respondent to pay to the plaintiff the suit amount of Rs.2,52,733/- together with future interest at the rate of 24% per annum. When the suit was pending for trial, the petitioner/defendant filed an application under Order 26 Rule 10(a) (i) and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure in I.A.No.716 of 2011 and pleased to send the suit pro note along with the admitted signature of suit summons, vakkalath or any other admitted document to the Director, The Forensic Science Laboratory Department, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-4 for comparison of handwriting and to report the same through an Advocate Commissioner.

2. The learned Subordinate Judge, Vellore after affording an opportunit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top