SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 2393

M.S.RAMESH
T. Senthil – Appellant
Versus
S. Thalavaiya – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Sivaraman, Advocate.
For the Respondent:A.P. Sathyamurthy, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records culminating in STC. No.1263 of 2018 dated 21.08.2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram and to quash the same.)

1. The private complaint filed by the respondent herein for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as 'NI Act') is under challenge in the present Criminal Original Petition.

2. Heard Mr.S.Sivaraman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Sathyamurthy, learned counsel for the respondent.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned complaint cannot be sustained since there is no legally enforceable debt under the cheque. According to the learned counsel, the agreement referred to in the complaint is only between the petitioner and 'RS Infotainment', wherein the cheques were issued only for security purposes, which ought not to have been deposited by the respondent herein. The learned counsel also submitted that the alleged payment of Rs.10 lakhs by demand draft and the balance amount of Rs.1,30,000,00/- by way of cash, is a blatant lie as such a huge amount

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top