SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 2620

T.RAVINDRAN
K. Sasikumar – Appellant
Versus
Rechal Rathnavathi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :A. Amalraj, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.146 of 2017 dated 26.02.2019 on the file of the Principal Judge, City Civil Court at Madras contrary to facts & Legal position confirming the decree and judgment pronounced in O.S. No.2251/2017 dated 04.01.2017 on the file of the XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court at Madras.)

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the judgment and decree dated 26.02.2019, passed in A.S.No.146 of 2017, on the file of the Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai confirming the judgment and decree dated 04.01.2017, passed in O.S. No.2251/2017, on the file of the XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

3. Suit for permanent injunction.

4. According to the plaintiff, she has purchased the suit property by way of a sale deed dated 09.05.1997 and the suit property with a larger extent was originally owned by Venkatapathy Chettiar and he sold the same to A.Subramani, by way of a sale deed dated 18.11.1953 and the plaintiff had purchased the suit property from the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top