SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 2672

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.K. Sasidharan, Abdul Quddhose, JJ.
M/s. Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai & Another - Appellant
Versus
R. Madurai & Others - Respondent
C.M.A. Nos. 2309 & 3164 of 2019 & CMP No. 10306 of 2019
Decided On : 04-09-2019

Advocates Appeared:
S. Arunkumar, A. Subadra for M/s. M. Malar, Advocates.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the correctness of the assessment of compensation under various heads by the Tribunal, highlighting the principles of assessing monthly income, dependency, and the application of the right multiplier for compensation calculation.

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Compensation - Section 173 - M.C.O.P. No.791 of 2016 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 173 - The court discussed the assessment of compensation under various heads, including loss of dependency, love and affection, loss of estate, transport expenses, and funeral expenses. It highlighted the principles of assessing monthly income, dependency, and the application of the right multiplier for compensation calculation.

Fact of the Case:

A person died in a motor vehicle accident, leading to a compensation claim. The claimant sought enhancement of compensation, while the insurance company challenged the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the assessment of compensation under various heads by the Tribunal was just and in accordance with settled legal principles. It dismissed both appeals and directed the insurance company to deposit the entire award amount along with accrued interest and costs as ordered by the Tribunal.

Issues: The issues revolved around the assessment of compensation, including the deceased's monthly income, dependency, and the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the assessment of the deceased's monthly income, dependency, and the application of the right multiplier for compensation calculation. It emphasized the correctness of the assessment of compensation under various heads by the Tribunal.

Final Decision: Both appeals were dismissed, and the insurance company was directed to deposit the entire award amount along with accrued interest and costs as ordered by the Tribunal.

JUDGMENT :

Abdul Quddhose, J.

Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the order and decree dated 03.09.2018 made in M.C.O.P. No.791 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, III Additional District Judge, Poonamallee.

1. CMA No.3164 of 2019 has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated 03.09.2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Poonamallee (III Additional District Court, Tiruvallur at Poonamalle) in M.C.O.P. No.791 of 2016. CMA No.2309 of 2019 has been filed by M/s. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited, challenging the same award questioning the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Brief facts leading to the filing of the instant appeals.

2. A person by name N.Janardhanam, died on 8.11.2016, as a result of the accident caused by the driver of the lorry bearing Registration No. TN 02 A 2727 owned by the first respondent in C.M.A. No.3164 of 2019 and insured with the appellant in C.M.A. No.2309 of 2019.

3. On 8.11.2016, Janardhanam was riding a motor cycle bearing TN 20 BL 9078 with his mother as the pillion rider on C.T.H. Road, Thiruninravur Bazaar, in front of Muthu Medicals, at that time, the lorry of the first respondent in C.M.A. No.3164 of 2019, bearing Registration No. TN 02 A 2727 came in the same direction hit against the motor cycle, due to the rash and negligent driving by its driver. Due to the said accident, M.Janaradhanam and his mother fell down on the road and the back wheel of the lorry run over them and they died on the spot.

4. As a result of the said accident, the father of the deceased M.Janaradhanam preferred a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Poonamallee in M.C.O.P. No.791 of 2016 against the respondents in C.M.A. No.3164 of 2019 seeking a compensation of Rs.1,56,00,000/-, which was restricted to Rs.1,20,00,000/-.

5. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Poonamalle by its award dated 03.09.2018, partly allowed the claim by directing the second respondent /Insurance Company in CMA No.3164 of 2019 to pay a sum of Rs.57,11,704/- together with interest at 7.5% from the date of petition viz., 22.12.2016 till the date of payment in favour of the appellant in C.M.A. No.3164 of 2019.

6. Unsatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award, the appellant in C.M.A. No.3164 of 2019 has preferred the said appeal seeking for enhancement of compensation. The Insurance Company viz. M/s. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company also aggrieved by the same award has preferred another appeal C.M.A. No.2309 of 2019 on the ground that the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award is excessive.

7. Heard Mr.S. Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company in C.M.A. No.2309 of 2019, who also represents the second respondent in C.M.A. No.3164 of 2019 and Ms.A.Subadra, learned counsel for the appellant in C.M.A. No.3164 of 2019, who also represents for the first respondent in C.M.A. No.2309 of 2019.

8. According to the claimant, who is the appellant in C.M.A. No.3164 of 2019, the Tribunal failed to consider the age of the deceased at the time of the accident. According to the claimant, the deceased was aged about 31 years old and was working as a Manager in ESSAR Projects India Limited, Cochin and was earning Rs.80,000/- p.m. at the time of the accident.

9. It is also the case of the appellant in C.M.A. No.3164 of 2019 that the Tribunal ought not to have deducted the tax out of the monthly salary payable to the deceased, while assessing the monthly income of the deceased for the payment of the compensation. Further, the Tribunal ought to have awarded more compensation under the heads of loss of dependency, love and affection, loss of estate, transport expenses and funeral expenses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top