Satheesh Kumar vs State - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 2869

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(Mad) 2869

S.VAIDYANATHAN, N.ANAND VENKATESH
Satheesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : T. Senthil Kumar, S.M.A. Jinnah.
For the Respondent: M. Chandrasekaran.

JUDGMENT :

1. These Criminal Appeals have been filed against the Judgment of the III-Additional District and Sessions Judge (FAC), Trichy in S.C. No. 114 of 2015, dated 06.11.2017, wherein the appellants were convicted and sentenced as follows:-

S. No.	Rank of the Accused	Offence under which convicted	Sentence of imprisonment	Fine amount
1.	A1 to A3	Under Section 449 IPC	Ten years Rigorous imprisonment	Rs. 5,000/- in default, to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment
2.	A1 to A3	Under Section 302 IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs. 5,000/- in default, to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment

2. The case of the prosecution in brief are as follows:

On 24.11.2014, at about 1.00 p.m. when the deceased Rathinam was talking with the defacto complainant (PW-1) and his wife PW-2, the accused persons with an intention to commit the murder of the deceased, approached him and requested him to show the portion, which was vacant in the first floor in order to take the same on lease. The deceased took the accused persons t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(Mad) 2869

S.VAIDYANATHAN, N.ANAND VENKATESHSatheesh Kumar – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

S.VAIDYANATHAN, N.ANAND VENKATESH
Satheesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent