SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 92

S.VAIDYANATHAN
Jayvidhya Jeyaraj – Appellant
Versus
Hari Hara Sankaran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:C. Prabhakaran, Advocate. For the Respondent:M/s. S. Deepika, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.3488 of 2019 from the file of the III Additional Family Court, Chennai and transfer to the Hon'ble Family Court at Tuticorin or to any other Court having jurisdiction.)

The Transfer Petition has been filed to transfer the case in H.M.O.P.No.3488 of 2019 pending on the file of the III Additional Family Court, Chennai to the file of the Family Court at Tuticorin or to any other Court having jurisdiction.

2. At the request of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter was taken up for hearing on 10.02.2020 in the Chambers and both the parties were present. On the said date, by consent of the parties, this Court had passed the following interim order:

“3. According to the petitioner/wife, she is working in a Bank for more than 10 years and her marriage with the respondent / husband was solemnized on 02.03.2017. The wife has stated that after the difference between them, she has been residing with her parents. She has further stated that she has been taking a medicine called “Sizdone” and the said factum has not been suppressed to her husband at any point of time. Though she is perfec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top