SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 110

M.GOVINDARAJ
S. K. Sampathkumar – Appellant
Versus
Indo Asain Finance Ltd, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:M. Balasubramanian, Advocate. For the Respondent:S. Nataraj Shankar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 22.11.2010 made in A.S.No.29 of 2009 passed by the learned VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai confirming the judgment and decree dated 10.04.2008, dismissing the suit in O.S.No.6614 o f2006 passed by the learned XII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.)

1. Aggrieved over the concurrent findings of the Courts below the unsuccessful plaintiff has preferred the above Second Appeal.

2. The suit was filed for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from encumbering or selling the A.L. Bus bearing registration No.PY-01-T-1677 to any third party for a consequential mandatory injunction to return back the same to the plaintiff.

3. The case of the plaintiff is that he availed hire purchase loan to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/- from the defendant. He was actually paid a sum of Rs.7,70,000/- out of Rs.10,00,000/-. Besides a sum of Rs.55,000/- was taken for service charge and the balance amount of Rs.2,30,708/- was retained by the defendant as deposit. As per the agreement, the plaintiff shall repay the loan amount along with interest at the rate of 36% in 36

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top