R.SUBRAMANIAN
K. Rathinam – Appellant
Versus
Gopalakrishnan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., to set aside the judgment and decree dated 09.08.2018 in A.S.No.78 of 2015 on the file of the Learned Principal District Judge of Salem, reversing the judgment and Decree dated 31.03.2015 in O.S.No.586 of 2013 on the file of the III Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem.)
1. The second defendant in OS No.586 of 2013, who managed to convince the Trial Court to dismiss a suit for partition and declaration that the Sale Deed dated 10.05.1999 executed by the first defendant in favour of the second defendant and the Mortgage Deed dated 09.02.2011 executed by the second defendant in favour of the third defendant as invalid and not binding on the plaintiff, upon the said judgment being reversed by the Appellate Court in AS No.78 of 2015 has come up with this Second Appeal.
2. The plaintiff sued for the aforesaid reliefs contending that the suit property was purchased by him along with his paternal aunt Marakkal during his minority i.e. on 16.09.1992. By virtue of the joint purchase the plaintiff was entitled to a half share in the suit property. The suit property was a vacant site and with a view to put up construction therein
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.