T.RAVINDRAN
Mallika – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by the Inspector of Police, Barur Police Station, Krishnagiri – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C against the judgment dated 30.10.2013 passed in S.C.No.109 of 2011 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Krishnagiri.)
1. The appellant (A2) and her son Ramesh (A1) were charge sheeted by the respondent police under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Krishnagiri, by judgement dated 30.10.2013 passed in S.C.No.109 of 2011 acquitted A1 Ramesh of the offences put forth against him under Sections 498-A & 304-B IPC, however, proceeded to convict the appellant/A2 under Section 304-B and sentenced her to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and under Section 498-A IPC and sentenced her to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and the sentences of imprisonment imposed on the appellant / A2 are ordered to run concurrently. Impugning the same, the criminal appeal has been preferred by the appellant.
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, according to the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.