BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R. Tharani, J.
Muthukrishnan – Petitioner
Versus
State Represented by the Inspector of Police, Thiruppachethi Police Station – Respondent
Crl. R.C.(MD)No. 185 of 2020
Decided On : 16-07-2020
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act - Jurisdiction of Special Court - The court directed the petitioner to file a petition before the Special Court for the release of the vehicle under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a criminal revision case to set aside the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate and to direct the release of the petitioner's vehicle under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the petitioner to file a petition before the Special Court, citing previous instructions given in a similar case.
Issues: Jurisdiction of the Special Court under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on previous instructions given in a similar case, emphasizing that the release of the vehicle under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act should be placed only before the Special Court.
Final Decision: The Criminal Revision Case is disposed of with the direction for the petitioner to file a petition before the Special Court.
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: This criminal revision case is filed under Sections 397 r/w. 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the impugned order passed by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppuvanam in Cr.M.P.No.148 of 2020, dated 10.02.2020 and consequently direct to release the petitioner's vehicle in bearing Registration No.TN-58-AD-0435.)
1. This revision has been filed to set aside the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.148 of 2020, dated 10.02.2020, on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppuvanam and to direct to release the petitioner's vehicle bearing Registration No.TN-58-AD-0435.
2. On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, the respondent has to file a private complaint before the concerned authorities and hence, there is no jurisdiction for the Special Court to try the case and the case can be tried only by the Judicial Magistrate Court and prays the vehicle to be returned to the petitioner.
3. On the side of the prosecution, it is stated that if the vehicle is returned, again the petitioner might commit the same offence.
4. It is seen that this Court in the case of Muthu v. the District Collector has specially given instructions that releasing the vehicle under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act should be placed only before the Special Court.
5. In the above circumstances, the petitioner is directed to file a petition before the Special Court. With the above direction, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. No Costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.