BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R. Pongiappan, J.
R. Parimala – Petitioner
Versus
The Dean, Thanjavur Medical College & Hospital, Thanjavur & Others – Respondents
W.P.(MD)No. 7636 of 2020
Decided On : 21-07-2020
Pregnancy Termination - Minor Victim of Sexual Offence - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Section 3, Section 5 - The court directed the termination of pregnancy of a minor victim of a sexual offense, despite the pregnancy exceeding the statutory limit of 20 weeks, considering compelling reasons and the well-being of the victim.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct the termination of her sister's minor daughter's pregnancy, a victim of a sexual offense, as it would affect her physically and mentally. The authorities had delayed the decision, leading to the filing of the writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the medical termination of the pregnancy, considering the victim's age, the impact on her education, and the compelling reasons for termination.
Issues: Delay in decision for pregnancy termination, applicability of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the well-being of the minor victim.
Ratio Decidendi: The court can allow termination of pregnancy beyond the statutory limit if there are compelling reasons, especially in cases involving minors and victims of sexual offenses.
Final Decision: The court directed the immediate commencement of the termination of pregnancy process for the minor victim, ensuring her safety and preserving the foetus for medical tests in the pending criminal case.
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to terminate the unwanted pregnancy of the petitioner's sister's daughter minor Durgadevi, Daughter of Ilangovan, aged 15 years, born on 01.09.2004 as per the recommendation of the second respondent in No.181/Ma.Ku.Pa.A/2020, dated 09.07.2020, caused due to the crime committed against her in Crime No.7 of 2020 for the offence under Sections 4, 5(i)(ii), 5(n) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 09.07.2020, within a time frame as fixed by this Court.)
1. The petitioner's sister's daughter (Minor) Durgadevi, is a victim in Crime No.7 of 2020 on the file of the fifth respondent Police registered for the offence under Sections 4, 5(i)(ii), 5(n) and 6 of POCSO Act, 2012. According to the petitioner, after the demise of the victim girl's mother, taking advantage of the family situation, the father and grandfather of the victim girl committed the crime against her. Due to the offence committed upon the victim girl, she got pregnant and she is now 7 months pregnant. Since the victim is a Minor girl, aged about 15 years, the petitioner has moved the authorities to terminate the pregnancy of her sister's minor daughter, as it would affect her both physically and mentally. Alleging inaction on the part of the authorities, she has filed the instant Writ Petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent/Dean, Thanjavur Medical College and Hospital, Thanjavur, to terminate the pregnancy of her sister's minor daughter.
2. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner took the victim girl in Raja Mirasudar Hospital, Thanjavur and the victim was subjected for medical examination by the Doctor. The Doctor, after examination, opined that the victim was 7 months pregnant. Based on the complaint given by the petitioner's sister's daughter, a case in Crime No.7 of 2020 for the offence under Sections 4, 5(i)(ii), 5(n) and 6 of POCSO Act, 2012, has been registered against the accused. Thereafter, the petitioner took the victim girl to the Government Hospital at Thanjavur and requested them to terminate the unwanted pregnancy. They have admitted her in the Hospital, but refused to terminate the pregnancy, because of the registration of a criminal case. Further, one Indirani, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Govt. Raja Mirasudar Hospital, Thanjavur, examined the said victim girl and in view of her physical and mental health condition, suggested for terminating the pregnancy. Based on this report, the District Child Protection Officer has addressed a letter to the District Legal Services Authority, Thanjavur, requesting appropriate action, but there was no further progress. According to the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, delay in taking any decision for terminating the pregnancy would affect the victim badly and therefore, prays for allowing this petition.
3. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
4. At this juncture, it is relevant to refer Section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (in short 'the Act'), which deals with termination of pregnancy and the same is extracted as under:
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), a registered medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence under that Code or under any other law for the time being in force, if any pregnancy is terminated by him in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner-
(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exce
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.