IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B. Pugalendhi, J.
Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Tiruchuli Police Station, Virudhunagar District – Respondent
Crl. A. (MD) No. 37 of 2015
Decided On : 13-08-2020
Rape - Sexual Offences - Indian Penal Code - 376(2)(f), 307 - Summary: The court discussed the evidence of witnesses, medical reports, and legal principles related to the testimony of close relatives as witnesses. The court emphasized that the testimony of close relatives should be considered with care and caution, and highlighted the Supreme Court's observations on the reliability of such witnesses.
Fact of the Case:
A three-year-old child was raped by the appellant, who was found guilty and convicted under Sections 376(2)(f) and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution's case was supported by witness testimony and medical evidence. The appellant appealed the conviction.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the appellant guilty based on the testimony of close relatives, corroborated by medical evidence, and rejected the appellant's appeal.
Issues: Reliability of witness testimony, sufficiency of medical evidence, and the interpretation of legal principles related to the testimony of close relatives.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to consider the testimony of close relatives with care and caution, citing relevant legal precedents. It also highlighted the corroborative value of medical evidence in cases of sexual offences.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appellant's appeal, confirmed the judgment of the trial court, and directed the appellant to undergo the remaining period of the sentence.
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records in connection with the order passed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Aruppukottai, in S.C.No.86 of 2012, dated 24.09.2014 and quash the same.)
1. This is a very unfortunate case, wherein, a three year old child was raped. The appellant was tried for the offence under Sections 376(2)(f) and 307 IPC, with an allegation that the appellant, taking advantage of his position as a relative of the victim child, has taken the child to a remote place and committed rape on the child. The trial Court, namely, Assistant Sessions Court, Aruppukottai, found him guilty for the offence under Sections 376(2)(f) and 307 IPC in S.C.No.86 of 2012, and by judgment dated 24.09.2014, convicted and sentenced him as follows:
| Section of Law | Punishment |
| 376(2)(f) IPC | To undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-, i/d to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. |
| 307 IPC | To undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-, i/d to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. |
2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:
2.1. PWs.2 & 3 are sisters. The accused is the husband of PW3 and PW1 is the husband of PW2. PW2, the younger sister of PW3, is having two female children and is living with her husband [PW1] at Meenakulam Village in Tiruchuli Taluk. The accused and PW3 invited PWs.1 & 2 for the pongal festival to their village at Thotiyangulam. On the invitation of the accused and PW3, PWs.1 & 2 went to Thotiyangulam on 19.10.2011 at about 11.00 am. On that evening, around 07.00 pm, the accused took the child of PWs.1 & 2, namely, Parameshwari [victim child]. The other family members did not doubt the same, as they were under the impression that the accused, being the uncle of the victim child, took her for getting some toffies for her. But, they did not return even after two hours and therefore, they started to search for the accused and the victim girl. During the search, around 10.00 pm, near Krishnapuram Road, they hear a crying sound of a child and went to the place of occurrence, where, they found the accused, without any dress, is attempting to have penetrated sex with the victim girl. On seeing PWs.1 & 2 and others, the accused fled away from the place of occurrence and they found blood injuries on the private parts of the victim child as well as on her Anus. Immediately, they took the victim child to a Private Nursing Home, namely, Fathima Hospital and thereafter, took the child to Government Hospital, Aruppukottai on the next day. From Government Hospital, Aruppukottai, the victim child was referred to Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai, for further treatment.
2.2. On the intimation from the Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai, the Sub-Inspector of Police [PW13] went to the Hospital on 20.10.2011, recorded the statement of the father of the victim child, namely, Vellai [PW1] around 01.30 pm, returned to Tiruchuli Police Station and registered a case in Crime No.342 of 2011, under Sections 376 and 307 IPC. PW13 then forwarded the printed First Information Report [Ex.P9] to the concerned Judicial Magistrate and to the Higher Officials.
2.3. Thiru Kannan, Inspector of Police [PW14], on receipt of the intimation, visited the place of occurrence on 20.10.2011 around 05.00 pm, prepared an observation mahazar [Ex.P4] in the presence of PWs.8 & 9, recorded their statements. The Inspector of Police has also arrested the accused near Moolakarampatti Bus Stop, on the same day, at about 06.30 pm. PW14 also made a request for chemical examination of the accused and accordingly, the accused was produced before Dr.Jeyasimhan [PW12], Government Hospital, Aruppukottai. The Doctor [PW12], after examining the accused, opined that the accused is a potent an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.