SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 825

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Datchayanee – Appellant
Versus
K. Durai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :K. Varadhakamaraj, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R. Sree Vidhya, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Common Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the common award and judgment dated 04.01.2012 made in MCOP.Nos.559 & 509 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Fast Tract Court No.2) Poonamallee.)

(These Appeal have been taken up for hearing through Video Conferencing)

1. These two appeals have been filed by the respective claimants seeking enhancement of compensation under the impugned common award dated 04.08.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Fast Track Court No.2, Poonamallee in MCOP.Nos.559 & 509 of 2012 respectively. CMA.No.2734 of 2014 arises out of MCOP.No.559 of 2012 and CMA.No.2735 of 2014 arises out of MCOP.No.509 of 2012.

2. The findings of the Tribunal under the impugned common award as regards the negligence of the driver of the insured vehicle has attained finality, since no appeal has been filed by the second respondent insurance company challenging the said findings.

3. The only question involved in these appeals are whether the quantum of compensation assess

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top