SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 827

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
J. Balaji – Appellant
Versus
N. Murugan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ramya V. Rao, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Rajadurai, N. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the fair and decretal order dated 28.11.2012 in MCOP.No.1933 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,/VI Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.)

(This Appeal has been taken up for hearing through Video Conferencing)

1. This Appeal has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated 28.11.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (VI Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai) in MCOP.No.1933 of 2008.

2. The Appellant being unsatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award has filed this Appeal. The findings as regards the negligence of the driver of the insured vehicle has attained finality, since no appeal has been filed by the second respondent insurance company with regard to the said findings.

3. Hearing Mrs. Ramya learned counsel for the Appellant as well as Mr.Rajadurai representing Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan, learned counsel for the second respondent. The first r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top