SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 3152

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
R. C. Subramanian – Appellant
Versus
S. Sulochana – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :R.C. Subramanian, Advocate.
For the Respondent:M. Guruprasad, R. Jayaprakash, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure as against the judgment and decree dated 20.02.2013 in A.S.No.62 of 2012 on the file of I Additional Sub-Court, Erode confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.103 of 2008 dated 27.04.2012 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Erode.)

1. This second appeal has been filed challenging the concurrent findings of the courts below.

Brief facts leading to the filing of the second appeal:

2. The Appellants 1, 2 and 3 are the defendants 1, 2 and 13 respectively in the suit O.S.No.103 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Erode. The first respondent is the plaintiff, the respondents 2 to 11 are the defendants 3 to 12, the respondents 12 to 17 are the defendants 14 to 19 in the suit O.S.No.103 of 2008. During the pendency of this second appeal, the fifth respondent died and respondents 18 to 21 were brought on record as his legal representatives by order of this Court dated 22.06.2016 passed in CMP.Nos.7949 to 7951 of 2016.

3. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court.

4. The plaintiff filed a suit O.S.No.103 of 2008 bef

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top