Balkis Natciar vs Arulmigu Adheeswarar Thirukoil represented by the Trustees appointed by the Government under the provisions of the Pondicherry Hindu Religious Institutions Act.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(Mad) 1099

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Balkis Natciar – Appellant
Versus
Arulmigu Adheeswarar Thirukoil represented by the Trustees appointed by the Government under the provisions of the Pondicherry Hindu Religious Institutions Act. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. T.P. Manoharan, Senior counsel for Mr.K.P.Jotheeswaran
For the Respondent: Mr. C.Prakasam

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2007 made in O.S.No.10 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the Additional District Judge, Pondicherry at karaikal.)

The appeal suit is filed, challenging the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2007 passed in O.S.No.10 of 2004.

2. The brevity of the plaint is as under :

The ancestors of the plaintiffs had extensive agricultural properties garden lands, cultivable lands, house sites, etc., in Keezhakasakudi village of Kottucherry Commune. The ancestors and the lands were locally identified as 'Kasakudi Pannai' having more than 40 velis of land originally. They had a large Pannai House refers to Pannai Bungalow. This estate consisted amongst other things a number of houses and house sites. The Pannai Kariasthar and those who were associated with the Pannai work and the land owners were permitted to occupy the manaicuts and houses free of rent. Local people were permitted to put temporary shelters on the large extent of uncultivable lands. In one or two case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2020 Supreme(Mad) 1099

S.M.SUBRAMANIAMBalkis Natciar – AppellantVersusArulmigu Adheeswarar Thirukoil represented by the Trustees appointed by the Government under the provisions of the Pondicherry Hindu Religious Institutions Act. – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Balkis Natciar – Appellant
Versus
Arulmigu Adheeswarar Thirukoil represented by the Trustees appointed by the Government under the provisions of the Pondicherry Hindu Religious Institutions Act. – Respondent