SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 3203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS AT MADURAI BENCH
M. Sathyanarayanan, B. Pugalendhi, JJ.
S.A. Manikandan – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(MD) No. 4807 of 2019
Decided On : 28-11-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P. Ganapathi Subramanian
For the Respondent: A.K. Baskarapandian, Special Government Pleader

Headnote:

Mines and Mineral (Development Regulation) Act, 1957 – Section 23 and 21 – Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 – Rule 38 – Illegal Transportation – National Highways Authorities – Taluk Level Task Forces – Writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus directing respondents to ensure illegal sand mining and transportation is curtailed by installation of closed circuit television video with internet protocol in all major roads at reasonable distance – Writ petitioner is that though there are several toll plazas all over State huge quantities of sand are transported with help of by installing closed circuit television video with internet protocol illegal excavation and transportation of sand can to some extent be checked and curtailed provision empowers State Government to make necessary Rules to prevent illegal mining transportation and storage of minerals no appropriate steps were taken by Government to prevent illegal mining activities –Held, Public Works Department has conducted a drive and enrolled in website and through lorries alone common public has to purchase sand – Apart from common public lorry owners can purchase sand directly from this sand portal – No mechanism to identify eligible person for purchase of sand – Anybody can approach sand portal purchase sand and sell for exorbitant rate huge difference between demand arid supply price of sand stood up to exorbitant level and block marketers and those lorry owners who have enrolled with Department alone are reaping benefits shelter and cloth are basic needs of mankind and a duty is cast upon Government to ensure common public gets same sand must be treated as an essential commodity and a price control system must be evolved duty of Government to ensure that natural resources meant for all human being is judiciously exploited and it benefits common public – Writ petition is disposed.

ORDER :

B. Pugalendhi, J.

1. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to ensure the illegal sand mining and transportation is curtailed by installation of closed circuit television video with internet protocol in all major roads at reasonable distance.

2. The concern of the writ petitioner is that though there are several toll plazas all over the State, huge quantities of sand are transported with the help of the officials. Therefore, by installing closed circuit television video with the internet protocol, the illegal excavation and transportation of sand can to some extent be checked and curtailed. Though the provision under Section 23(c) of the Mines and Mineral (Development Regulation) Act, 1957, empowers the State Government to make necessary Rules to prevent the illegal mining, transportation and storage of minerals, no appropriate steps were taken by the Government, to prevent the illegal mining activities and therefore, there are illegal mining activities taking place in Tamil Nadu, particularly in Cauvery river Basin.

3. Taking cognizance of this writ petition, this Court by order dated 01.03.2019 has raised the following queries.

1. Number of FIRs filed with regard to the illegal sand quarrying and illegal transportation for the past five years through Tamil Nadu (District wise details to be given)?

2. In how many cases, final reports have been filed and give the details?

3. Whether the sand mining in Tamil Nadu is being illegally transported to other States. If it is so, how many cases have been filed and whether the vehicles are seized and file a status report to that effect.?

4. Whether steps have been taken to establish Special Courts providing for speedy trial as per Rules?

5. Whether the earlier order passed by the Division Bench of This Court for Constitution of Special Bench has been complied with?

4. In response, the respondent has filed a report on 22.03.2019 that 6728 vehicles have been seized during 2013-2014, 6623 vehicles have been seized during 2014-15, 5146 vehicles have been seized during 2015-2016, 8786 vehicles have been seized in the year 2016-17 and 17320 vehicles have been seized in the year.

5. Further it is stated that the Director of Geology and Mining Department, has requested the Principal Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Chennai - 9, to form a Special Court vide his letter R.C. No. 8981/MM6/2018, date 26.02.2019 and the same is under active consideration. It is stated that 52 check posts are functioning across the State to monitor the vehicles.

6. Though several vehicles have been seized for illegal transportation, there is no detail with regard to the number of vehicles confiscated as contemplated under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

7. Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 stipulates that any tool, equipment, vehicle or any other things used for raising, transporting any mineral from any land without any lawful authority shall be liable to be seized and those tool, equipment, vehicle or any other things seized under Sub Section 21(4) are liable to be confiscated under Section 21 (4A) of the Act by an order of the Court competent to take cognizance of the offence under Sub Section (1) of Section 21 of the Act. Though Section 21(4A) of the Act mandates confiscation of the vehicles, tool used for illegal mining, apparently no vehicle nor any tool was confiscated by- the authorities so far. Similarly, in G.O. Ms. No. 135, - Industries (MMA1) Department, dated 13.11.2009, while reconstituting the District Level Task Forces and Taluk Level Task' Forces certain responsibilities have been fixed upon the Village Administrative Officer, Tahsildar, Officer in charge of the area that they shall be held responsible for not taking proper action against the offender as against the illegal mining. The District Collectors are directed to take departmental action against those erring officials.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top