SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 2985

N.ANAND VENKATESH
L. Ganesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

N. Anand Venkatesh, J.

1. These Criminal Original Petitions have been filed seeking to quash the proceedings initiated by the respondent for an offence under section 41 & 87 of the Factories Act, 1948, r/w 61-E & F & section 21(2) Rules 53 & 95 of the Tamil Nadu Factories Rules, 1950.

2. The petitioners are the occupier and the Manager of Rane Brake Linings Limited.

3. The private complaint has been instituted based on two incidents. The first incident pertains to V. Krishnamurthy who was aligning ejection pins of clutch facing module in pre-form machine. At that time, the press was operated in an unsafe manner, as a result of which, he sustained caused bodily injuries. The relevant Form No. 18 prescribed under Rule 96 was filed by indicating that the said B. Krishnamurthy was aligning ejection pins in preform press No. 245 with a screw driver and his helper was doing inching up action, the screw driver got slipped and his right hand index finger got crushed.

4. The second incident that has been cited in the complaint pertains to S. Ramesh, who is an apprentice, while he was taking the inspected rail blocks to packing area by trolley and some of the blocks fell down on his ri

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top