B.PUGALENDHI
Alex Pandian – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B. Pugalendhi, J.
1. The appellant, who is the sole accused, was charged for the offence under Sections 394 r/w 398 IPC and tried before the Assistant Sessions Court, Virudhunagar, in S.C. No. 13 of 2013 and the trial Court, by order dated 17.02.2014, found the appellant/accused guilty under Sections 394 r/w 398 IPC, convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-, i/d to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. As against the conviction and sentence imposed upon him, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.
2. The case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, is as follows:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.