SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 1204

G.JAYACHANDRAN
Rukumani Ammal – Appellant
Versus
P. A. Periyasamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :A. Sundaravathanan, Advocate
For the Respondents:N. Manokaran, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.105 of 2008 dated 09.09.2009 on the file of Principal District Court, Erode, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.s.No.172 of 2004 dated 27.04.2007 on the file of District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai, Erode District.)

(The case has been heard through video conference)

1. The Second Appeal is filed by the unsuccessful plaintiff in her suit for permanent injunction.

2. The defendants in the suit are admittedly the owners of the land west of the suit property. The cause of action for the suit alleged to have arisen on 05.04.2003, when the 1st defendant with the active support of his men, attempted to trespass into the suit property and form a cart track in the suit property.

3. According to the plaint, she is the widow of Late.Arunachala Gounder. On 06.07.1977 Arunachala Gounder and his brother C.Palanisamy through the partition deed divided the family property among themselves. The suit property measuring 0.76 acres was allotted to the Arunachala Gounder. On the death of Arunachala Gounder, who died intestate in the year 1979, the plaintiff and h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top