SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 1221

G.JAYACHANDRAN
Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
Ranganathan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :P. Dinesh Kumar for D. Ravichander, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.6 of 2009 dated 19.10.2009 on the file of the Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court – 2), Tindivanam, confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.38 of 2006 dated 20.12.2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam.)

(The case has been heard through video conference)

1. The Appellant in this Second Appeal is the plaintiff in the suit. Aggrieved by the dismissal of the suit by the Trial Court and the Appeal by the First Appellate Court, the present Second Appeal is filed against the concurrent finding of the Courts below.

2. The case of the appellant as plaintiff in the original suit is that, the property described under 'B' schedule of the plaint originally belong to one Govinda Gounder S/o. Subburaya Gounder. He sold it to one Narayanasami S/o. Kuppa Padayachi under the registered sale deed dated 11.04.1944 and delivered the possession. The property was under the exclusive possession and enjoyment of the said Narayanasami, till his death. He died intestate leaving behind his daughter Govindammal as his sole heir. She took possession of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top