SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 1239

A.A.NAKKIRAN
K. R. Mani – Appellant
Versus
P. Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Marudhachalamurthy, Advocate
For the Respondent:R. Renukadevi, N. Manokaran, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed, under Section 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order, dated 05.11.2015, made in IA.Nos.128 and 129 of 2015 in IA.No.688 of 2014 in OS.No.66 of 2014 by the Subordinate Judge, Sankari.)

1. These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed, against the fair and decreetal order dated 05.11.2015, made in IA.Nos.128 and 129 of 2015 in IA.No.688 of 2014 in OS.No.66 of 2014, by the Subordinate Judge, Sankari.

2. The facts of the case, in a nutshell, leading to filing of this Civil Revision Petition are as follows:-

(a) The Defendant is the Petitioner herein and the Respondent is the Plaintiff. The suit was filed for recovery of money with interest. The suit was decreed exparte on 30.06.2014. The Defendant has filed IA.No.688 of 2014 to set aside the exparte decree and the said IA was allowed on payment of cost of Rs.250/- to the Plaintiff on or before 07.01.2015. Since the cost was not paid on the due date, the IA was dismissed on 08.01.2015. The Defendant has filed IA.No.128 of 2015 on 16.02.2015 to restore the IA.No.688 of 2014 and IA.No.129 of 2015 on 16.02.2015 to extend the time by one week t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top