SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 1301

G.JAYACHANDRAN
Janaki Ammal & Others Khaderkhan – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :R. Meenal, Advocate.
For the Respondents:K.A. Ramakrishnan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 13.02.2009 passed in A.S.No.15 of 2007 on the file of the Sub Court, Kallakurichi confirming the judgment and decree dated 26.10.2006 passed in O.S.No.418 of 2003 before the II Additional District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi.)

(The case has been heard through Video Conferencing)

This Second Appeal is directed against the concurrent finding of the Courts below allowing the suit filed by the respondent herein for permanent injunction against the appellants herein.

2. Brief facts of the case is that the suit schedule property, which is a tiled house and vacant site appertain to it more fully described as items 1 and 2 in the plaint schedule, has been claimed by the plaintiff as his ancestral property, which he inherited through his maternal grandmother Jaidoon Bee, who had executed a Will dated 11.06.1998 in favour of the plaintiff and died on 03.01.1999. The plaintiff has been in possession and enjoyment of the house and vacant site appertain on the south of the tiled house. The respondents/appellants are trying to trespass into the land and house. Hence, su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top